Matthew 2:13-23 · Matthew

Flight to Egypt

Joseph is warned by an angel in a dream to flee to Egypt with Mary and Jesus to escape King Herod's plan to kill the child. After Herod's death, Joseph is instructed to return to Israel, but he settles in Nazareth due to the reign of Archelaus in Judea.

Summary

This passage from the Gospel of Matthew recounts the early life of Jesus and the divine guidance that protected him from danger. The main characters are Joseph, Mary, Jesus, King Herod, Herod's son Archelaus, and an angel of the Lord. Prior to this passage, wise men from the East visited Jesus in Bethlehem, prompting King Herod to feel threatened by the birth of a new "king of the Jews." The passage begins with an angel appearing to Joseph in a dream, instructing him to take Mary and Jesus and flee to Egypt to escape Herod's plan to kill Jesus (Matthew 2:13).

Joseph immediately obeys the angel's command. He takes Mary and Jesus and departs for Egypt under the cover of night (Matthew 2:14). They remain in Egypt until Herod's death, fulfilling a prophecy that said, "Out of Egypt have I called my son" (Matthew 2:15). After Herod dies, an angel again appears to Joseph in a dream, telling him it is safe to return to Israel because those who sought Jesus's life are dead (Matthew 2:19-20). However, upon learning that Herod's son Archelaus is ruling in Judea, Joseph fears returning there. Warned in another dream, he decides to settle in Galilee, specifically in the town of Nazareth (Matthew 2:22).

The passage concludes with Joseph, Mary, and Jesus establishing their home in Nazareth. This final move fulfills another prophetic statement, that Jesus "shall be called a Nazarene" (Matthew 2:23). The passage establishes the divine protection over Jesus and the fulfillment of prophecies concerning his early life.

Chiastic structure

ⓘ
A

Matthew 2:13-14

“the angel of the Lord appeareth to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and flee into Egypt”

B

Matthew 2:15

“that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt have I called my son”

A'

Matthew 2:19-20

“an angel of the Lord appeareth in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, Saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and go into the land of Israel”

Both A and A' involve divine instruction through dreams to Joseph, emphasizing God's guidance and protection for Jesus.

Interpretation and theological stakes

The passage in Matthew 2:13-23 establishes the divine protection over Jesus and highlights the fulfillment of prophetic words concerning his life. The narrative emphasizes the role of divine intervention through dreams, guiding Joseph to act in ways that ensure Jesus's safety. The passage's conclusion ties Jesus's early life to the fulfillment of prophecies, suggesting that these events have been preordained as part of a divine plan. The journey to and from Egypt is not just a flight from danger but a significant movement that aligns with prophetic utterances, underscoring Jesus's identity and mission.

A mainstream Christian interpretation argues that this passage fulfills Old Testament prophecy as a typological reference to Jesus. Specifically, Matthew 2:15 cites Hosea 11:1, "Out of Egypt have I called my son," interpreting it as a prophecy about Jesus. This reading views Jesus as the ultimate fulfillment of Israel's story, drawing a parallel between Israel's exodus from Egypt and Jesus's return from Egypt. The passage suggests that Jesus embodies the true meaning of the son called out of Egypt, marking him as God's chosen one and aligning his life with Israel's historical narrative.

In contrast, Rabbinic Judaism interprets Hosea 11:1 as a reference to the historical exodus of Israel, not as a prophecy about Jesus. This reading emphasizes the original context of Hosea, where the verse refers to God calling Israel, His "son," out of Egypt during the exodus. From this perspective, Matthew's use of the verse is seen as a reinterpretation rather than a fulfillment. The focus here is on the historical and collective identity of Israel, with the exodus being a foundational event that defines the nation's relationship with God, rather than a foreshadowing of an individual messianic figure.

The passage's true significance emerges when considering both interpretations. It reflects the tension between the original context of Hebrew scripture and its reinterpretation within the Christian tradition. By framing Jesus's early life within the narrative of Israel's history, Matthew connects Jesus to the larger story of God's relationship with His people. This dual reading enriches the understanding of how early Christians saw Jesus not only as a continuation of Jewish tradition but also as fulfilling and expanding it. The passage suggests that Jesus’s life is intricately woven into the fabric of biblical prophecy, serving both as a continuation and a transformation of the narrative.

Continue reading with a Scholar plan

Upgrade to Scholar