What does Matthew 21:21:33 say?

Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country:

What does Matthew 21:21:34 say?

And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it.

What does Matthew 21:21:38 say?

But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance.

Matthew 21:33-46 · Matthew · Updated April 25, 2026

Wicked Tenants

Q: What does Matthew 21:21:35 say?

And the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another.

In the parable of the Wicked Tenants, a householder plants a vineyard and leases it to tenants before traveling to a distant country. When he sends servants to collect the vineyard's fruits, the tenants beat, kill, and stone them. Finally, the householder sends his son, whom the tenants also kill, hoping to seize his inheritance.

Summary

In Matthew 21:33-46, Jesus tells a parable to the chief priests and Pharisees. A householder plants a vineyard, equips it with a winepress and a tower, and leases it to tenants before leaving for a distant country (21:33). The vineyard owner represents authority, while the tenants manage the vineyard in his absence. The parable addresses themes of responsibility and accountability, setting the stage for the unfolding events.

As the story unfolds, the householder sends his servants to the tenants to collect the vineyard's fruits. However, the tenants mistreat the servants, beating one, killing another, and stoning a third (21:34-35). The owner sends even more servants, but they meet the same fate (21:36). Finally, the householder sends his son, believing they will respect him. Instead, the tenants plot to kill the son to seize his inheritance, and they do so by casting him out of the vineyard and killing him (21:37-39).

The parable concludes with a question of justice. Jesus asks what the vineyard owner will do to the tenants, and the answer is that he will destroy them and lease the vineyard to others who will fulfill their obligations (21:40-41). Jesus then cites scripture about the rejected stone becoming the cornerstone, declaring that the kingdom of God will be taken from the current leaders and given to those who produce its fruits (21:42-43). The chief priests and Pharisees realize the parable is directed at them, but they hesitate to act against Jesus due to his popularity with the people, who see him as a prophet (21:45-46). The parable of the Wicked Tenants in Matthew 21:33-46 delivers a message about accountability and judgment. The passage focuses on the unfaithfulness of the tenants, who represent the leaders of Israel. They abuse their responsibility, mistreating the servants and killing the son of the vineyard owner. The primary conclusion of the passage is that those who fail in their duty to produce the fruits expected by God will face severe consequences. This accountability is not just about individual actions but extends to leadership as a whole, setting a precedent for future judgment and the transfer of responsibilities to those who will honor them.

Chiastic structure

ⓘ

Matthew 21:33-39

“The husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another... But last of all he sent unto them his son.”

Matthew 21:42-43

“The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner... The kingdom of God shall be taken from you.”

Matthew 21:44-45

“Whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken... they perceived that he spake of them.”

The theme of rejection and judgment in A and A' mirrors each other, focusing on the consequences of rejecting rightful authority.

Interpretation and theological stakes

One mainstream interpretation, particularly from a Catholic perspective, sees the vineyard as the Kingdom of God and the tenants as the Jewish people who were initially entrusted with it. This reading argues that the parable predicts the transfer of the Kingdom to the Church. The vineyard owner, representing God, sends his son, an allusion to Jesus, whom the tenants kill (21:38). This act leads to the judgment that the Kingdom will be given to others who will bear its fruits (21:43). This interpretation emphasizes the continuity of God's plan through the Church, which becomes the new steward of the Kingdom after the rejection of the son by the initial tenants.

A second interpretation comes from Rabbinic Judaism, viewing the vineyard as Israel itself, with the tenants symbolizing the religious leaders of Jesus’ time. This perspective reads the parable as a critique of these leaders' failure to guide the people according to God's will. The mistreatment of the servants (prophets) and the killing of the son (a representation of the Messiah) illustrate the leaders' rejection of divine messengers (21:34-38). Here, the focus is on the leaders' accountability, suggesting that their failure to produce righteous results leads to the vineyard being entrusted to others who will fulfill their obligations (21:41-43). This interpretation emphasizes the importance of righteous leadership in maintaining the covenant with God.

By examining both interpretations, the passage emphasizes the theme of divine justice and the necessity of faithfulness to God's mission. The text challenges leaders of any era to reflect on their responsibilities and warns that failure to fulfill these obligations can lead to the loss of their entrusted roles. The parable's broader implication is that the Kingdom of God is dynamic, entrusted to those who will actively participate in its mission. Both readings agree that the focus is not merely on the transfer of stewardship but on the importance of producing spiritual fruit, demanding a continuous and sincere commitment to God’s purposes. The passage begins with a landowner who plants a vineyard and leases it to tenants before going away (Matthew 21:33-39). The tenants reject the landowner's servants and eventually kill his son. This theme of rejection is mirrored at the end, where the discussion shifts to the consequences for those who reject the cornerstone (Matthew 21:44-45). Between these bookends, the central moment occurs when Jesus cites scripture about the stone the builders rejected becoming the cornerstone (Matthew 21:42-43). This pivot marks a turning point from the rejection of the son to the establishment of a new foundation, signaling a shift in authority and the eventual judgment on those who reject it.

Continue reading with a Scholar plan

Upgrade to Scholar