The Freemasons
Secret Societies · Updated August 15, 2026
Overview
Freemasonry's three rival global traditions all call themselves regular and label the others irregular, meaning there is no single authority that decides what counts as legitimate Freemasonry. The split dates back to medieval stonemason guilds of the 14th century, the oldest existing secular fraternal organization. Those early craft guilds in England evolved into a philosophical society that formally organized in 1717, when the Premier Grand Lodge of England was founded in London. Anthony Sayer became the first Grand Master of that original body, establishing a structure of local Lodges supervised regionally by a Grand Lodge that still defines the organization today.
The fracture came in 1877, when the Grand Orient of France removed the requirement for belief in a supreme being. That decision split Freemasonry into two hostile camps. The Anglo-American tradition requires members to believe in a higher power and keeps a volume of sacred law open in every working lodge, whether a Bible, Quran, or other text. Discussion of religion and politics is strictly banned. The Continental or Liberal tradition discarded those restrictions, permitting political debate inside lodges and dropping the religious belief requirement entirely. A third tradition emerged in 1893, when French journalist Maria Deraismes and physician Georges Martin co-founded Le Droit Humain in Paris, the first major Co-Masonic obedience to admit both men and women. Women's Freemasonry now includes exclusively female groups like the UK-based Order of Women Freemasons alongside mixed-gender organizations like Le Droit Humain and Universal Co-Masonry.
Each of these traditions operates independently today, with its own Grand Lodges or Grand Orients setting policy for the local Lodges beneath them. The women's branches compound the complexity, since each Grand Orient independently decides whether to require religious belief, regardless of admitting women. A conservative women's lodge may align with Anglo-American requirements, while a liberal one follows Continental practice. No global body reconciles these differences, and mutual recognition between the traditions remains selective and contested.
Freemasonry's three rival global traditions all call themselves regular and label the others irregular, meaning there is no single authority that decides what counts as legitimate Freemasonry.
The Freemasons (stakes)
Continue reading with a Scholar plan
Upgrade to Scholar