Luke 16:19-31 · Luke · Updated April 25, 2026

Rich Man & Lazarus

A rich man lives in luxury while a beggar named Lazarus suffers at his gate. Both die, and Lazarus is taken to Abraham's bosom while the rich man is tormented in hell. The rich man pleads for relief and for Lazarus to warn his brothers, but Abraham denies his requests, emphasizing the sufficiency of Moses and the prophets for guidance.

Summary

The parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus, found in Luke 16:19-31, contrasts the lives and afterlives of two men, highlighting themes of wealth, poverty, and judgment. It introduces two main characters: a rich man, who lives in luxury and wears fine clothing, and a poor beggar named Lazarus, who suffers at the rich man's gate, covered in sores and longing for scraps from the rich man's table (verses 19-21). This contrast sets the stage for the events that follow, showing the stark differences in their earthly lives.

As the narrative progresses, both men die. Lazarus is carried by angels to "Abraham's bosom," a place of comfort, while the rich man finds himself in torment in Hell (verse 22-23). In his suffering, the rich man sees Abraham with Lazarus and pleads for mercy, asking Abraham to send Lazarus to cool his tongue with water (verse 24). Abraham responds, reminding the rich man of the good things he received in life compared to Lazarus's suffering, and explains that a great gulf prevents anyone from crossing between the two realms (verses 25-26). The rich man then begs Abraham to send Lazarus to warn his five brothers so they might avoid his fate (verses 27-28).

The passage concludes with Abraham's refusal, stating that the brothers have Moses and the prophets to guide them (verse 29). The rich man argues that they would repent if someone from the dead visited them, but Abraham counters that if they do not listen to Moses and the prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead (verses 30-31). The parable ends with this assertion, emphasizing the sufficiency of existing scriptures for guidance and the hardness of heart that ignores such warnings. The main conclusion of the passage is the stark contrast between earthly life and the afterlife based on one's choices and actions. The rich man and Lazarus experience a complete reversal of fortunes after death, highlighting the idea that earthly wealth and comfort do not equate to eternal security. The text suggests that how one responds to the needs of others, particularly the poor and suffering, carries weight in determining one's eternal destiny. This parable emphasizes the importance of heeding the moral teachings found in "Moses and the prophets" (Luke 16:31) as a guide for living a life aligned with God's expectations.

Chiastic structure

ⓘ
A

Luke 16:19-21

“There was a certain rich man...and there was a certain beggar named Lazarus...”

B

Luke 16:29

“They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.”

A'

Luke 16:22-23

“The beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried; And in hell he lift up his eyes...”

The reversal of fortunes between the rich man and Lazarus highlights the theme of justice and the consequences of earthly actions.

Interpretation and theological stakes

The Catholic interpretation often views this passage as illustrating the existence of an intermediate state after death, a concept akin to Purgatory. The rich man's plea for relief and his concern for his brothers (Luke 16:24, 27-28) are interpreted as evidence of ongoing awareness and concern, which suggest a state where the soul is conscious and capable of experiencing change. The dialogue between the rich man and Abraham implies an ongoing process rather than an immediate final judgment. The idea of an "intermediate state" is supported by the mention of "Abraham's bosom," a place of comfort distinct from final Heaven or Hell (Luke 16:22-23).

In contrast, the Reformed Protestant interpretation sees the parable as a metaphorical teaching about the finality of judgment after death. This perspective emphasizes the irreversible nature of one's eternal state after death, as highlighted by the "great gulf" fixed between the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16:26). This chasm emphasizes the permanence of the judgment rendered at death, aligning with the Reformed view that earthly life is the sole opportunity for repentance and faith. The insistence that Moses and the prophets provide sufficient guidance (Luke 16:31) further supports the idea that the time for change is before death, rendering post-mortem appeals ineffective.

Considering both interpretations, the passage highlights the urgency of responding to God's call during one's lifetime. While Catholic tradition suggests a potential for change after death, the Reformed view stresses the finality of earthly choices. The parable, therefore, serves as a warning about the consequences of ignoring prophetic teachings and living a life indifferent to the suffering of others. By weaving together the themes of justice, mercy, and the sufficiency of scripture, the text calls readers to reflect on the moral and spiritual priorities that shape their lives. The passage opens with a vivid contrast between two lives: a rich man who enjoys lavish luxury and a beggar named Lazarus who languishes at the gate, desiring scraps from the rich man's table (Luke 16:19-21). It closes with a reversal, where Lazarus is comforted in Abraham's bosom while the rich man suffers in Hell, pleading for relief (Luke 16:22-23). Between these bookends lies a crucial exchange where Abraham emphasizes the sufficiency of "Moses and the prophets" for guiding one's life, insisting that they provide all necessary warnings and teachings (Luke 16:29). This central event emphasizes the theme that the guidance necessary for Salvation is already available, and the fate of both men illustrates the consequences of heeding or ignoring this guidance.

Continue reading with a Scholar plan

Upgrade to Scholar